MassIVE MSV000083561

Imported Reanalysis Dataset Public PXD008493

Assessment of sample preparation bias in mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Subscribe Comment Reanalyze Spectra Compare Results Add Reanalysis

Description

For mass spectrometry-based proteomics, the selected sample preparation strategy is a key determinant for information that will be obtained. However, the corresponding selection is often not based on a fit-for-purpose evaluation. Here we report a comparison of in-gel (IGD), in-solution (ISD), on-filter (OFD), and on-pellet digestion (OPD) workflows on the basis of targeted (QconCAT-multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method for mitochondrial proteins) and discovery proteomics (data dependent acquisition, DDA) analyses using three different human head and neck tissues (i.e. nasal polyps, parotid gland, and palatine tonsils). Our study reveals differences between the sample preparation methods, for example with respect to protein and peptide losses, quantification variability, protocol-induced methionine oxidation and asparagine/glutamine deamidation as well as identification of cysteine containing peptides. Moreover, none of the methods performed best for all types of tissues, which seemingly argues against the existence of a universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. [dataset license: CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0)]

Keywords: nasal polyps ; parotid gland ; palatine tonsils ; proteomics ; sample preparation

Contact

Principal Investigators:
(in alphabetical order) 		Peter Horvatovich, University of Groningen Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Department of Pharmacy Analytical Biochemistry Building 3226, Room 6.9 Antonius Deusinglaan 1 9713 AV Groningen Internal Zip Code XB20 P.O. Box 196 9700 AD Groningen The Netherlands Telephone: +31-(0)50-363 3341 Fax: +31 (0)50 363 7582 Mobile: +31 (0)6 2459 7203 Email: p.l.horvatovich@rug.nl Homepage: www.biomac.nl, N/A
Submitting User: ccms

Publications

Klont F, Bras L, Wolters JC, Ongay S, Bischoff R, Halmos GB, Horvatovich P.
Assessment of Sample Preparation Bias in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.
Anal. Chem. 2018 Apr 17;90(8):5405-5413. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

Number of Files:
Total Size:
Spectra:
Subscribers:
 
Owner Reanalyses
Experimental Design
    Conditions:
    Biological Replicates:
    Technical Replicates:
 
Identification Results
    Proteins (Human, Remapped):
    Proteins (Reported):
    Peptides:
    Variant Peptides:
    PSMs:
 
Quantification Results
    Differential Proteins:
    Quantified Proteins:
 
Browse Dataset Files Browse Results
 
FTP Download Link (click to copy):

Species

Instrument

Modifications

- Dataset Reanalyses

+ Dataset History

Click here to queue conversion of this dataset's submitted spectrum files to open formats (e.g. mzML). This process may take some time.

When complete, the converted files will be available in the "ccms_peak" subdirectory of the dataset's FTP space (accessible via the "FTP Download" link to the right).
Number of distinct conditions across all analyses (original submission and reanalyses) associated with this dataset.

Distinct condition labels are counted across all files submitted in the "Metadata" category having a "Condition" column in this dataset.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
Number of distinct biological replicates across all analyses (original submission and reanalyses) associated with this dataset.

Distinct replicate labels are counted across all files submitted in the "Metadata" category having a "BioReplicate" or "Replicate" column in this dataset.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
Number of distinct technical replicates across all analyses (original submission and reanalyses) associated with this dataset.

The technical replicate count is defined as the maximum number of times any one distinct combination of condition and biological replicate was analyzed across all files submitted in the "Metadata" category. In the case of fractionated experiments, only the first fraction is considered.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
Originally identified proteins that were automatically remapped by MassIVE to proteins in the SwissProt human reference database.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
Number of distinct protein accessions reported across all analyses (original submission and reanalyses) associated with this dataset.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
Number of distinct unmodified peptide sequences reported across all analyses (original submission and reanalyses) associated with this dataset.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
Number of distinct peptide sequences (including modified variants or peptidoforms) reported across all analyses (original submission and reanalyses) associated with this dataset.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
Total number of peptide-spectrum matches (i.e. spectrum identifications) reported across all analyses (original submission and reanalyses) associated with this dataset.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
Number of distinct proteins quantified across all analyses (original submission and reanalyses) associated with this dataset.

Distinct protein accessions are counted across all files submitted in the "Statistical Analysis of Quantified Analytes" category having a "Protein" column in this dataset.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
Number of distinct proteins found to be differentially abundant in at least one comparison across all analyses (original submission and reanalyses) associated with this dataset.

A protein is differentially abundant if its change in abundance across conditions is found to be statistically significant with an adjusted p-value <= 0.05 and lists no issues associated with statistical tests for differential abundance.

Distinct protein accessions are counted across all files submitted in the "Statistical Analysis of Quantified Analytes" category having a "Protein" column in this dataset.

"N/A" means no results of this type were submitted.
This dataset may not contain all raw spectra data as originally deposited in PRIDE. It has been imported to MassIVE for reanalysis purposes, so its spectra data here may consist solely of processed peak lists suitable for reanalysis with most software.