An analytical comparison of the MSstats and MSstatsBig workflows applied to the same quantification results by FragPipe. The MSstatsBig workflow employs strategies to reduce the size of the input files and works without loading the full dataset into memory. Files named Procedure 2A were processed with MSstats and Procedure 2B were processed with MSstatsBig. Both R scripts and the output of each step are included. FragPipe quantification results were included, both in MSstats format (msstats.csv) and DIA-NN output (resport.tsv). An additional subset file ("testing_input.csv") is included for testing purposes. Metadata is included by default in the msstats.csv file and is not required in a separate file.
[doi:10.25345/C5S756W5H]
[See
results attachment job
for details]
Keywords: CPTAC
Number of Files: | |
Total Size: | |
Experimental Design | |
Conditions:
![]() |
|
Biological Replicates:
![]() |
|
Technical Replicates:
![]() |
|
Identification Results | |
Proteins (Human, Remapped):
![]() |
|
Proteins (Reported):
![]() |
|
Peptides:
![]() |
|
Variant Peptides:
![]() |
|
PSMs:
![]() |
|
Quantification Results | |
Differential Proteins:
![]() |
|
Quantified Proteins:
![]() |
|
Browse Reanalysis Files | |
Browse Quantification Results | |
FTP Download Link (click to copy):
|